<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for patspam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.patspam.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.patspam.com</link>
	<description>patspam patspam patspam</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 23:44:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3244</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PlebGUI: WebGUI Meets Plack by patspam.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; It&#8217;s official: WebGUI 8 will be Plack-powered</title>
		<link>http://blog.patspam.com/2009/plebgui-webgui-meets-plack/comment-page-1#comment-9342</link>
		<dc:creator>patspam.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; It&#8217;s official: WebGUI 8 will be Plack-powered</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 23:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.patspam.com/?p=1212#comment-9342</guid>
		<description>[...] in December 2009 I wrote about PlebGUI, an experimental branch of WebGUI with mod_perl replaced with Plack/PSGI. As a result, I was able [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in December 2009 I wrote about PlebGUI, an experimental branch of WebGUI with mod_perl replaced with Plack/PSGI. As a result, I was able [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Plack Apps in Javascript by Jay</title>
		<link>http://blog.patspam.com/2010/plack-apps-in-javascript/comment-page-1#comment-9341</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.patspam.com/?p=1384#comment-9341</guid>
		<description>Would be funny if  you could port node.js code to run under Plack, with this ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would be funny if  you could port node.js code to run under Plack, with this <img src='http://blog.patspam.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Plack Apps in Javascript by Patrick</title>
		<link>http://blog.patspam.com/2010/plack-apps-in-javascript/comment-page-1#comment-9340</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.patspam.com/?p=1384#comment-9340</guid>
		<description>Thanks perlpilot, I fixed the typo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks perlpilot, I fixed the typo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Plack Apps in Javascript by perlpilot</title>
		<link>http://blog.patspam.com/2010/plack-apps-in-javascript/comment-page-1#comment-9339</link>
		<dc:creator>perlpilot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 03:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.patspam.com/?p=1384#comment-9339</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve a bug in your factorial function.  It obviously doesn&#039;t matter for your example but 0! is 1, not 0.  So ...

  if (x &lt; 2) return 1;

Though, of course factorial of negative numbers is undefined.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve a bug in your factorial function.  It obviously doesn&#8217;t matter for your example but 0! is 1, not 0.  So &#8230;</p>
<p>  if (x &lt; 2) return 1;</p>
<p>Though, of course factorial of negative numbers is undefined.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Serve up Dancer webapps for six bucks by Patrick</title>
		<link>http://blog.patspam.com/2010/serve-up-dancer-webapps-for-six-bucks/comment-page-1#comment-9321</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 04:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.patspam.com/?p=1368#comment-9321</guid>
		<description>I’ve added 3 new Web Frameworks to the site, all with live demos:

* Web::Simple
* CGI::Application
* Mojolicious

I tried adding Titanium but it didn’t build cleanly on my test box (due to Pod::Xhtml dependency failing its tests).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve added 3 new Web Frameworks to the site, all with live demos:</p>
<p>* Web::Simple<br />
* CGI::Application<br />
* Mojolicious</p>
<p>I tried adding Titanium but it didn’t build cleanly on my test box (due to Pod::Xhtml dependency failing its tests).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Serve up Dancer webapps for six bucks by Shuck &#38; Awe #5: Hunting for Perl &#124; The Pythian Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.patspam.com/2010/serve-up-dancer-webapps-for-six-bucks/comment-page-1#comment-9320</link>
		<dc:creator>Shuck &#38; Awe #5: Hunting for Perl &#124; The Pythian Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 21:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.patspam.com/?p=1368#comment-9320</guid>
		<description>[...] find a hosting company that lets you have the environment to do so? Patrick Donelan might have a very enticing proposition for you with his shared hosting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] find a hosting company that lets you have the environment to do so? Patrick Donelan might have a very enticing proposition for you with his shared hosting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Serve up Dancer webapps for six bucks by Patrick</title>
		<link>http://blog.patspam.com/2010/serve-up-dancer-webapps-for-six-bucks/comment-page-1#comment-9318</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 13:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.patspam.com/?p=1368#comment-9318</guid>
		<description>@jay and @Justin: good suggestion, I&#039;ll add Titanium it to the list.

@garu: I&#039;m guessing Catalyst and Mojolicious will work a treat on the host where Dancer already works. Would love to include DreamHost, just waiting for someone with an account there to put up their hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jay and @Justin: good suggestion, I&#8217;ll add Titanium it to the list.</p>
<p>@garu: I&#8217;m guessing Catalyst and Mojolicious will work a treat on the host where Dancer already works. Would love to include DreamHost, just waiting for someone with an account there to put up their hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Serve up Dancer webapps for six bucks by garu</title>
		<link>http://blog.patspam.com/2010/serve-up-dancer-webapps-for-six-bucks/comment-page-1#comment-9317</link>
		<dc:creator>garu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 12:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.patspam.com/?p=1368#comment-9317</guid>
		<description>Very nice! Looking forward to see results on Catalyst and Mojolicious. Oh, and also more hosting providers, like DreamHost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice! Looking forward to see results on Catalyst and Mojolicious. Oh, and also more hosting providers, like DreamHost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Serve up Dancer webapps for six bucks by Justin</title>
		<link>http://blog.patspam.com/2010/serve-up-dancer-webapps-for-six-bucks/comment-page-1#comment-9316</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 09:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.patspam.com/?p=1368#comment-9316</guid>
		<description>Getting CGI::App/Titanium support stats would also be luscious. Thanks for the work you&#039;ve done, already!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Getting CGI::App/Titanium support stats would also be luscious. Thanks for the work you&#8217;ve done, already!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Serve up Dancer webapps for six bucks by Kiffin</title>
		<link>http://blog.patspam.com/2010/serve-up-dancer-webapps-for-six-bucks/comment-page-1#comment-9315</link>
		<dc:creator>Kiffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 07:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.patspam.com/?p=1368#comment-9315</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve bundled the bare essentials quite nicely, providing a good, solid framework for web-based applications. Looking forward to a more advanced version using Catalyst which could provide another flavor?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve bundled the bare essentials quite nicely, providing a good, solid framework for web-based applications. Looking forward to a more advanced version using Catalyst which could provide another flavor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
